Boston Review
CURRENT ISSUE
table of contents
FEATURES
new democracy forum
new fiction forum
poetry
fiction
film
archives
ABOUT US
masthead
mission
rave reviews
contests
writers’ guidelines
internships
advertising
SERVICES
bookstore locator
literary links
subscribe

 

Search this site or the web Powered by FreeFind


Site Web



 

 

In This Forum

During the Cold War, US/Soviet conflict moved the hands of the nuclear clock perilously close to midnight. That war is over now, and the Soviet Union is gone. But nuclear danger is not. Instead, a new set of threats has emerged over the past decade: proliferation and testing, new efforts to build missile defenses, and a nearly complete collapse of the arms control framework constructed since in the early 1960s. Thus Jonathan Schell’s bracing claim that "We are witnessing … the emergence of an extremely volatile and dangerous second age of nuclear danger."

In this New Democracy Forum, which grew from a debate at a recent American Historical Association meeting, a group of American and Russian analysts explore the processes that ended the first nuclear age, the pressures behind the new threats, and the prospects for addressing those threats. Historians Lawrence Wittner and Vladimir Zubok contest peace-through-strength interpretations of the end of the Cold War, and emphasize the importance of the Nuclear Freeze Campaign, European peace movements, and Gorbachev’s vision for the future of the Soviet Union. Schell and Sergey Rogov examine the emergent threats, and trace them to a disturbing reinterpretation of nuclear weapons (as normal weapons of war, rather than exceptional responses to an historical emergency), the dominant international role of the United States, new military technologies, and the absence of a suitable vocabulary for understanding the new nuclear world.

Randall Forsberg’s concluding comments locate some sources for hope. A founder of the US Nuclear Freeze Campaign, Forsberg thinks that the resurgence of a popular movement against nuclear weapons is essential to ending the new dangers. In this, she returns to a central theme that runs throughout: that peace is the product of good politics. Though not an especially optimistic message--the current state of our politics is not so good--it is an important message. For it means that if this second age of danger ends badly, we will have only ourselves to blame.

Joshua Cohen

 

 

 

Joel Rogers

Originally published in the April/May 2000 issue of Boston Review



Copyright Boston Review, 1993–2005. All rights reserved. Please do not reproduce without permission.

 | home | new democracy forum | fiction, film, poetry | archives | masthead | subscribe |