OUR SPONSORS







Strapped

My Eight Years with a Gun

photobunny


“You’re sure this is what you want to do?” my cousin Danny asked as he turned off the car engine. We had just pulled into the parking lot of Davis and Sons, a large pawnshop in downtown Louisville, Kentucky.

“Yeah,” I nodded, “I’m sure.”

We locked up the car and walked into the shop. Though Davis and Sons carried the standard pawnshop fare of used cameras, musical instruments, watches, and jewelry, the largest part of the store by far was the section devoted to firearms. Aisles of racks and display cases held hundreds of new and used rifles, shotguns, revolvers, and semi-automatic pistols, in all sizes and calibers, with “prices to fit any budget,” as a large sign in the window proclaimed. Danny and I walked up to a display counter and began looking over the merchandise.

“Help you boys?” a salesman asked.

“I’m looking to buy a gun,” I told him. “I don’t have a lot of money. You got anything used for around $75?”

“This is for target or protection?” he asked.

“Protection.”

It was January of 1982, and I was in Louisville for a short stay, visiting family and friends for the holidays. My home for the previous five years had been the Fort Greene section of Brooklyn, a run-down, though affordable, neighborhood. I’d moved there in 1977 to study art at the Pratt Institute and was now trying to make a living as a freelance magazine photographer.

Crime was a serious and frightening problem in Fort Greene. In the short time I’d lived there, a female friend of mine had been raped in the lobby of her apartment building, and a half-dozen other friends and acquaintances had been mugged or assaulted. In a subway station, one of my Pratt professors was beaten so badly that he needed hospitalization. I was robbed at gunpoint once, and beaten up by a gang of strangers on another occasion. My apartment was burglarized early one Saturday morning, the intruder taking my wallet from my bedside table as I lay asleep.

My parents knew none of this. The only members of my family I’d confided in were Danny and his father, my uncle Jim, a former Louisville cop and a Marine Corps marksman. They were also the only ones who knew of my decision to buy the pistol.

After careful consideration, weighing the benefits of several different guns, I walked out of the store with a .22 caliber RG six-shot revolver, the epitome of a cheap Saturday night special. Aside from its $65 price, the salesman also emphasized the RG’s capacity to accept long-rifle cartridges. These larger shells had a hollow-point slug that flattened on impact and were delivered at a higher muzzle velocity than regular .22s. These features made for greater tissue and organ damage, made the gun’s potential to incapacitate an assailant, its “stopping power,” much greater.

Since I was returning to New York the next day, the salesman kindly let me take the pistol and a box of shells with me when I left the store, ignoring Louisville’s mandatory 24-hour “cooling-off” period, a day’s wait between the purchase and pickup of a handgun. The law had been imposed on all gun shops within the city limits a few years earlier, after an angry office worker had purchased a pistol on his lunch hour and used it to shoot his boss in the head a short time later.

In addition to violating the cooling-off period, the purchase that day was illegal for other reasons. Though I was living in New York, I’d fraudulently used my parents’ address to obtain the Kentucky driver’s license needed to buy the RG. Transporting the gun across state lines—putting it in my suitcase and taking it with me back to Brooklyn the next morning—was a federal offense, as an attorney friend would later point out. And though everyone in my neighborhood seemed to be doing it, carrying a concealed, unlicensed handgun on the streets of New York City was illegal, punishable at the time by a mandatory year in jail for a first offense.

None of this concerned me. The laws against doing what I was doing seemed highly abstract at the time. More real to me were my experiences and the experiences of my friends and acquaintances as victims of violent crime. My neighborhood was exceptionally dangerous, and the city seemed either unable or unwilling to make it less so. The fear and anger I felt made me believe there was little alternative to carrying a gun.



• • •


It was not as though violence was something new to me. The neighborhood where I’d grown up was a tough, working-class enclave in the south end of Jefferson County, Kentucky. Though I spent my teens in a neighborhood where almost every family had a relative who’d gone off to fight in Vietnam, I had shoulder-length hair and wore an army jacket with a peace flag embroidered over the left breast pocket. I’d been harassed often and assaulted on several occasions; a long-haired friend of mine ended up in the emergency room after two rednecks beat him up with a baseball bat. The risk of being attacked on the streets of Brooklyn seemed, more or less, an extension of the threat of being stomped in my high school parking lot.

The difference now was what I was going to do about it. Nobody was ever going to take a piece out of me again. The first time I rode the subway with the gun in my pocket, it was with the bitter satisfaction that I’d finally drawn a line no one was ever going to cross. When I was out on the street or on the train late at night, I would often slip my hand into my coat pocket and press my palm against the butt. It felt very, very good. For the next eight years, I never left my apartment without the gun, was never on the street without feeling its weight in my pocket.

The fear and anger I felt made me believe there was little alternative to carrying a gun.

I love guns. They are seductive, with a visceral appeal that seems to bypass reason entirely and go directly to some more primitive part of the brain. When my uncle Jim saw that I couldn’t be dissuaded from buying the pistol, he offered to take me to a local firing range for the first of several lessons, using a large-frame Smith & Wesson .357 Magnum that he owned. To heft that gun, to squeeze off that first shot and feel the recoil shake my arms and torso, was to experience the power of an extraordinary machine. The pistol was dangerous and difficult to master. But by the end of my first session of target practice, I could consistently put six shots into center mass on a black silhouette target at 30 feet. It was hard not to feel like a badass.

I also hate and fear guns. The .22 in my pocket had one purpose: to take a life. That reality was never far from my mind, and the thought that I might have to kill an attacker—or that an attacker might somehow take the gun away and use it to kill me—was deeply sobering. Then and now, it seemed almost absurd that it had taken me several months of study, practice, and testing before the State of Kentucky saw fit to give me a driver’s license, yet it had taken all of 30 minutes to pick out, purchase, and take possession of the gun I now carried in my pocket. A gun is as destructive in its own way as any automobile.

While organizations such as the National Rifle Association may see themselves as protectors of the Second Amendment, what America’s gun culture has cost in wasted human life is impossible to deny, even putting aside the horrors of events like the Sandy Hook shootings. According to the Centers for Disease Control, in 2008, 31,593 Americans were killed with a firearm, including 12,179 people who were murdered and 18,223 people who used a gun to commit suicide. The figures include 2,037 children and teens murdered with a gun, and 748 kids who used guns to kill themselves. In ten states—Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Indiana, Michigan, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Virginia and Washington—you are now more likely to die from a gunshot wound than in an automobile accident, according to figures from the Violence Policy Center, an advocacy group.

And while gun rights organizations are quick to trumpet anecdotal stories of gun owners who’ve successfully used a handgun to defend themselves or stop a crime, those numbers pale alongside the number of gun deaths. According to the FBI, between 2005 and 2009, only 975 deaths caused by civilians using firearms were justifiable homicides—killings in response to the commission of a felony.

Several years before I bought the RG, I’d talked with a cop who walked a beat around Pratt. We’d become acquaintances and would occasionally stop and chat if we happened to bump into each other. One afternoon, the conversation had for some reason turned to guns. The cop wore a police marksman’s badge, seemed fairly conservative in his politics, and was not someone I’d necessarily expect to speak up against private ownership of handguns. But when I mentioned my ex-cop uncle and several other members of my family back home who kept guns in the house, his face darkened.

“Your uncle was a police officer, that’s one thing,” he began. “He’s been trained. But the NRA has this party line that everyone oughta be able to carry a gun for protection. That more guns make us all safer. That’s bullshit. You want to know what happens? I see this shit every day. Two friends go into a bar, they get tanked, they have an argument. One guy gets really pissed, he has a gun in his pocket, he pulls it out. Boom! His friend is dead. Some kid finds his dad’s gun in the dresser drawer. Boom! His baby sister is dead.”



• • •


I discovered that in many ways life with a gun was more stressful than without. I quit reading on the subway, instead paying rapt attention to the other people in the car, looking to see who got on and off the train, and re-evaluating the threat level after every stop. There was also the ever-present fear that, in a moment of carelessness, the bulge of the revolver might be visible through a jacket pocket, or through the rear pouch of the small grey camera bag I used to carry it when the weather got warm.

The more I carried the RG, the more I also realized how little it afforded in terms of real protection. Carrying a handgun in your jacket pocket or your waistband on the streets of New York City is vastly different from keeping one for target shooting. Only the former poses the question: “Can you kill?”

This isn’t simply a question of whether you’re capable of taking a life and living with the ugly consequences. It’s a question of how well you understand the other implications, the hidden subtleties, inherent in the decision to carry a handgun. Can you read a situation quickly and accurately enough to gauge whether your life is truly in danger and whether drawing it is justified? Can you keep an assailant from taking your gun away and using it against you? Are you prepared to go about your everyday life unable to relax, scanning every face you see in the street or, in my case, in the subway, for any sign of danger?

The gun in my pocket was a declaration that the city had broken the social contract.

All police cadets are trained in the use of deadly force, especially how and when it can be avoided. The training often involves role-playing: other cops (or hired actors) play out scenes an officer will likely encounter in the line of duty, such as a violent family dispute or a car stop. A key purpose of these exercises is to convey to a trainee how complex and chaotic these situations usually are, and how vastly different from what he may be expecting. A drunken husband may be beating his wife, also drunk. As the officers pin the husband to the floor and try to handcuff him, the wife might try to grab a gun from a cop’s holster and draw down, screaming at the officers to leave her man alone.

In my personal experience, violent crime had come quickly and unexpectedly. Someone stuck his foot in an elevator door and began asking for directions; a few seconds later, a confederate stepped up behind him and pulled a revolver out of a shopping bag. Someone suddenly grabbed me from behind and pinned my arms while another man stepped in front of me and punched me in the face. There was always a moment of hesitation on my part before reality sank in, hesitation that gave my attackers control of the situation. I constantly asked myself whether having a gun on those occasions would have made a difference, whether I would have been able, both physically and psychologically, to draw the weapon and use it before events spun completely out of my control. I tried very hard to believe the answer was yes. The truth was there was no way to know.

Imagine yourself sitting in the Century 16 Multiplex in Aurora, Colorado watching The Dark Knight Rises just after midnight on July 20, 2012. You’re carrying a gun in a shoulder holster under your jacket. (The state of Colorado allows its citizens to carry a concealed handgun with little restriction.) During the film, someone enters the theater through a side door. His hair is bright red and he’s wearing body armor. Do you know immediately that this person is armed and intends to kill as many members of the audience as he can? Do you think it might be some kind of promotional stunt or a prank, as many in the audience apparently do? Even after James Eagan Holmes has begun shooting, can you draw your weapon and take accurate aim at him, though the theater is pitch dark and dozens of people around you are screaming and stampeding for the exits? Are you as likely to kill one of them as you are to kill Holmes?



• • •


A year after I’d begun carrying the pistol, Anne Pfreundschuh, a 21-year-old Pratt student, was found severely beaten and drowned in the bathtub of her apartment. Her building was a few blocks over from mine. Two teenagers were convicted of the crime after they were caught trying to sell some of the items they’d stolen from their victim. One of them had been released from prison the day before the killing.

Ben Alman

Pfreundschuh’s death felt like a grim validation of my decision. Through all these horrific crimes, overshadowing all my other concerns, was a sense that I was fighting back and, with that sense, a feeling of bitter satisfaction, of defiance. Crime in my neighborhood seemed to be unmanageable. Drugs were dealt openly at several spots near my apartment building. At night my neighbors and I would listen to gunfire coming from the Fort Greene projects and the area around the Brooklyn Navy Yard.

If the government was powerless to stop this onslaught, then the gun in my pocket was a declaration that the city had broken the social contract. Not that the New York City justice system would have taken my view into account if I’d been arrested carrying the pistol. But I was frightened and angry, trying to make a living in a difficult field with little in the way of support or resources. The feeling that I had even the slightest control over my own safety made any risk seem worth it.



• • •


I told almost none of my friends that I was carrying a gun and said very little when discussion turned to the city’s rising crime rate. Most of my associates were professionals living in safer neighborhoods who hadn’t experienced violent crime the way I had. These friends generally were not products of the gun culture and were mostly in favor of strong gun-control laws, if not an outright ban on ownership. They would have been unsettled, to say the least, to know that I was usually carrying a loaded pistol when I visited their homes.

Two of my friends, my upstairs neighbors Wayne and Susan, did know what I was doing. Because they also knew the dangers of the neighborhood, they worried about what could happen to me. I was back in Louisville, Kentucky on another occasion, visiting my family over the Christmas holidays, when I read a short article in the local paper reporting that a man named Bernhard Goetz had shot four teenagers on a New York City subway train the day before. That night I called to check my answering machine and heard a message from Susan, who didn’t know I’d left town, asking me to get in touch with her and Wayne right away. I called her immediately.

“Everything’s okay,” she told me. “It’s just that yesterday, after those kids were shot on the train, the first thing we heard was that the man who did it was a skinny blonde white guy with glasses. We were afraid it was you.”



• • •


One afternoon, I was sitting on the G train heading toward downtown Brooklyn. My seat was next to the door and I was sitting with my legs crossed, my ankle propped on my knee, the sole of my shoe facing out into the car. There were one or two other riders in the car with me.

The train stopped, the doors opened, and a young black man, maybe seventeen or eighteen years old, stepped on. He wore a leather jacket with an eight-ball on the back, black designer jeans, and Cazal eyeglasses—thick-framed glasses with gold trim that were a hot fashion item with mid-1980s inner-city kids. As he walked into the car, his pant leg brushed up against the sole of my shoe, leaving a large streak of brownish-grey dust just above his knee.

“Shit,” he hissed as he reached down to brush off the dirt.

“I’m sorry,” I said as the doors closed and the train pulled away from the station.

A girlfriend slipped a surprise valentine card into my coat pocket and found the gun; we broke up a short time later.

“Fuck you,” he yelled. He straightened up and looked at me, then moved around to stand directly in front of my seat, his face hard, his eyes glaring down. He was muscular, and a little under six feet tall. At first I thought he was going to throw a punch.

Then his hand moved into his jacket pocket.

There was no way to know if he had a gun. But given his obviously expensive clothing, the possibility that I had just pissed off a local drug dealer loomed large. There had been a news report a few weeks earlier that crack dealers in my neighborhood had been giving their best runners—usually teenage boys from the projects—small semi-automatic pistols that fit easily into jacket pockets. A fifteen-year-old in upper Manhattan had recently used one to shoot a police officer in the neck, leaving the cop a quadriplegic.

The train lurched along and then slowed. I was sitting with my camera bag on my lap. The front section had my camera, light meter, and film. In the zippered back pocket was my gun. The zipper was undone, as it always was when I was in the subway or walking through dicey sections of my neighborhood. My right hand now slowly moved up, my fingers starting to creep inside the unzipped top.

“Fuck you, motherfuckin’ asshole,” he snarled.

I looked straight back into his eyes and made my face harden.

“I said I was sorry.” My words were slow and deliberate, my voice a monotone. The train began to pick up speed as we glared at each other. My hand slowly reached deeper into my bag, my fingertips brushed the gun’s metal hammer and moved down toward the pistol grip. I was waiting for the kid’s hand to emerge from his jacket pocket, was waiting to see the first glint of gun metal. He wouldn’t be expecting me to have a pistol, I reasoned. If his hand came out of his pocket with a weapon, I was betting he would draw it out slowly, giving me time to pull my own gun and squeeze off a shot before he could.

Several seconds passed. The kid’s hand stayed in his pocket. He looked down angrily at me for a moment more, then abruptly turned and walked into the next car without glancing back. A few minutes later, the train stopped, the doors opened, and I got off to make my connection.

In all the years I carried the pistol, that was the closest I came to using it.



• • •


I could tell myself the problems involved in carrying the piece were worth it, compared to what might happen the next time I found myself staring down someone on the subway. But I couldn’t deny that carrying the gun was having a corrosive effect on my life and relationships. A few of my friends eventually found out what I was doing, and I began to feel walls going up around people I cared about very much. A girlfriend, slipping a surprise valentine card into my coat pocket one morning, found the gun; we broke up a short time later.

Another time, standing on a corner in midtown, I felt a hand clap me on the shoulder and a voice boom out, “Hey buddy!” Startled, my muscles tensed and I turned quickly, instinctively putting my hand in my pocket. Behind me was my friend Chris, a squash buddy whom I’d confided in about the gun a few weeks before. He looked at me, eyes wide, shocked to see me bristling over an innocent joke.

“Hey, whoa!” he said, taking a step back from me. “I was just kidding.”

Immediately, I began apologizing, feeling Chris was now probably more rattled than I was. But from then on, I could never be certain if he was completely comfortable when we were together, whether some small part of him might be wary of my presence.

My fear of getting caught with the gun had also begun to grow. I’d managed to scrape together enough money to buy a used motorcycle, so the subway became less of a necessity. But riding the bike increased the probability of being stopped by the NYPD, who seemed to delight in pulling motorcyclists over for even the most minor infractions.

Unzipping the front of my knapsack, I took out my wallet, praying the cop hadn’t seen the gun barrel.

One warm Sunday afternoon in early summer I was on the bike, heading south on lower Fifth Avenue. At 14th Street, I made a left and, as I turned, caught sight of a cop on the corner, talking to an elderly woman. The officer’s head snapped up as I passed, he looked straight at me and raised his hand.

“Pull it over,” he yelled.

Perhaps it was the abruptness of his actions, maybe it was the volume of his voice; I felt my face blanch as hot panic set in. I was carrying a green canvas backpack with the gun tucked away in a side pocket. Pulling the bike over to the curb and cutting the engine, I swallowed hard, trying to force down the fear.

My instinct had been to run, to hit the gas and blaze out of there. But that was the worst thing I could do—every cop between 14th and the Brooklyn Bridge would immediately be looking for the white guy with the red motorcycle. The odds were not in my favor.

“License and registration,” the cop demanded. It occurred to me that he might have received a call on a perp who fit my description. If that was the case, I was moments away from a full frisk, a search of my bag and, almost certainly, arrest.

“Yeah, sure,” I replied hoarsely. “My wallet’s in my backpack.”

Still sitting astride the bike, I removed the knapsack and set it down on the gas tank. The gun in the side pocket made an unnervingly loud clunk as I set the bag down. Worse, as I looked down, I now saw that the barrel of the RG was poking part-way out of a small hole worn through the bag’s fabric. Trying not to seem agitated, I put my hand over the hole and took hold of the bag, pretending I was steadying it on the round tank, and quietly pushed the gun away from the worn spot. Unzipping the front, I took out my wallet, praying the cop hadn’t seen the gun barrel.

He took my license and registration card from my hand. I tried desperately to keep from shaking. He examined the documents carefully, saying nothing. I cleared my throat and took the chance that my voice wouldn’t sound like a broken pennywhistle.

“Did I make an illegal turn back there, officer?” I said. “I didn’t see any ‘No Turn’ signs.”

The cop examined my insurance card silently.

“Naw,” he finally said, not looking up. “That old lady back there was talking my ear off, and I had to find some way to get away from her.”

He looked at me and grinned, then handed the cards back.

“Drive safe, pal.” The officer turned and walked away.



• • •


About a year later, I fell in love with a woman who demanded that I put the gun away for good. The RG went into a box, and the box went into a closet. She and I married and moved to San Francisco shortly thereafter, to a quiet neighborhood by Golden Gate Park. Though a large city, San Francisco was seeing much less of the drug-fueled violence that had plagued New York during my years there. San Francisco felt safe to me, and the gun never left the box where I kept it.

I returned in 1997 to a vastly different New York City. There had been more than 2,245 homicides the year I left. The number now was a fraction of that. The Clinton administration had made federal funds available for more police officers, and the Giuliani administration had jumped on the money, hiring hundreds of additional cops. The government had also severely tightened the regulations on the licensing of federal firearms dealers, who are allowed to sell guns across state lines. This choked off a large part of the pipeline that made handguns easy to get. There were fewer pistols on the city’s streets. The number of homicides would eventually drop to around 500 annually. Last year there were 414 murders in New York, the lowest number on record.

The end came on a Sunday morning. I wrapped the RG in newspaper and stuffed it into an empty milk carton, which I put into a larger bag of household trash. I carried the bag down to the end of my block and dropped it into a street-corner garbage can.

I will never believe that carrying the gun made me safer in any real sense. Fear of crime was my reason for buying it, but the gun itself engendered a whole new set of fears, which proved to be even more corrosive to my psyche. For all the dangers the RG brought with it, it was never really needed. And for that fact, I will always be grateful.


Post this page to: del.icio.us Yahoo! MyWeb Digg reddit Furl Blinklist Spurl

Comments

1 |
I repelled a broad-daylight mugger on a city street by laying hand on the old revolver in my waistband.
— posted 02/02/2013 at 05:05 by Tarara Boumdier
2 |
Guns R Us
A great article, very well written. Had me hooked all the way through. But, with the current situation in the US and many parts of the world, a gun still seems to empower people to go where they would normally be afraid to go. Unless the State can show that people are safe under its police systems, citizens will not feel safe and, like the author of this article, will feel the need for self-defense.
— posted 02/02/2013 at 11:57 by holly
3 |
What I don't see in this article is any sense of the writer trying to "make friends" or get comfortable with his firearm.

Given the lack of a concealed carry permit in New York, it's no wonder he found carrying the gun stressful. Now he faces two threats: the crime in New York and the vice like grip of the police state.

That said, the author puts the blame on THE GUN and not the police state and not his lack of training and familiarity with his firearm. This is magical thinking.

If you're going to own a gun:

1) You have to follow the rules, even if the rules are asinine. Crime is stressful; getting a felony conviction for unlawful carry is even more stressful.

2) You have to commit to knowing your gun. You have to spend time on the range putting ammo through it, you have to know how to clean it, you have to know its quirks. If you don't do that, you're thinking of the gun as a magic totem -- much like the author of this piece did -- and not as a tool.
— posted 02/02/2013 at 13:27 by Dan In Kansas
4 |
Dan, did you not read the article? He didn't 'blame' the gun. There was no police state. He pointed out what any thinking, intelligent person knows - that the belief that you can pull out a gun and use it is the true magical thinking.

People who crap on about protecting themselves with guns are brainwashed by tv and movies. They see themselves as the hero in a film, the one who pulls the gun out and saves the day. Because that's what you can do when there's a script and stuff. And when the gun's not real and people aren't truly going to get killed.

In real life you get morons who pull their guns out and shoot teenagers because the don't like the way they look at them. In real life you get what the police officer in the story said - stupid, tragic incidents that kill people.

Lack of training - seriously Dan, are you suggesting that every person who gets a gun is trained in the same way police and defence force personnel are? What sort of training do you suggest?

And most importantly Dan - why? Why? The vast majority of people in the world live quite happily without having to carry guns. It is only a minority in the US who seem to think that the world is so dangerous, and their individual rights so paramount that the murder of children is a small price to pay for the right to carry a gun.

The rest of the world, Dan in Kansas, thinks people like you are pathetic and insane. And we fear for the vast majority of Americans who don't want to live in a gun culture, who want their children to be safe and who are being held ransom by gun madness and gun nutters. If I believed in a god, I'd be asking them to help your poor, beknighted country.
— posted 02/02/2013 at 13:52 by vj
5 |
The previous should have read, "signed vj, smugly ensconced in a nation that lacks a violent and criminal underclass"
— posted 02/02/2013 at 16:33 by chucho
6 |
My older brother lives alone on 350 acres in central Texas. He has 15 rifles,shotguns and pistols. He rarely leaves home, but when he does he has his ankle pistol firmly strapped. Good God, HE is the one to be feared !!
— posted 02/02/2013 at 16:39 by Kirby Larsen
7 |
Cue the violins . . .
What an overwrought piece of hysteria - hindsight hysteria at that.

This guy was living in a God-awful neighborhood in a God-awful city at a God-awful time. That was his main problem.

But I do agree with him - he should not have been carrying a gun. He sounds like an over-emotional wreck with little sense of what a gun was for. He should have been as aware of his surroundings as he was before he got the gun. Instead he adopted the hyper-tense "gunslinger mentality" - expecting to have to throw down at any moment.

And . . . what if the thug on the train HAD drawn a gun? What if he had defended himself and saved his own life? How would this essay be different then?

He has the benefit of not having had to defend himself - so he's against guns now.

Others are not so fortunate. A gun has saved their life. Or would have saved their life, had they been able to own or carry one.

This article was a waste of time - other than illuminating the hysterical irrationality of some people engaged in this debate.
— posted 02/02/2013 at 17:56 by CatoPublius
8 |
Most people
do not need guns unless they are big pussies.
— posted 02/02/2013 at 18:56 by Jeremy
9 |
Balanced take on the gun debate
Great piece Hal. I thought it was well-written and in way an ideological polemic surrounding the gun debate.
— posted 02/02/2013 at 21:35 by L
10 |
Nothing smug about it, chucho. My country, Australia, has enacted sensible laws in regards to guns, which the majority of people agree with. We have crime, we have predators, we have all that - but our children don't get gunned down in movie houses and at school. Our children don't kill themselves with a gun they found in dad's wardrobe. Our children don't get killed by a racist who doesn't like the look of a black teenager.

Spin it all you want you gun lovers. Everyone else knows that you are hysterical, irrational, selfish and cowardly. The world watches you in bemusement. No-one outside your country has any respect for you. And we fear for your future. It won't be your government which ends up running a fascist, totalitarian state. It will be the far right gun nuts. Your poor, poor. country.
— posted 02/02/2013 at 23:45 by vj
11 |
Food for thought
Thank you for your experience. It was vivid and interesting. The insights about the effect of a gun on your relationships were new to me. I grew up with them, but turned away after VietNam. The thought of shooting someone for any reason just seemed beyond comprehension. Two years ago a friend handed me an AK-47. It was so odd, that this guy, living a suburban life, would have such a thing, but the NRA justifications were all in place. It was the first time I had touched a gun in 30 years. It was this outlandish, twisted joke to stand there holding this nightmare made real. I am ashamed for even touching the thing. I look at the "debate" these days about guns as though it were a debate on the merits of slavery. A few people prosper, and the system is productive, but the level of suffering at some point will cause the system to collapse.
— posted 02/03/2013 at 02:56 by nomas
12 |
My eight years with gun
A great article
— posted 02/03/2013 at 12:52 by Subir Sen
13 |
Numerous errors of fact and logic in article
For example:
1) The picture is miscaptioned. A "Saturday night special" is a derogatory term for a very cheap, usually underpowered handgun. The term may fit your RG .22, but not the Smith & Wesson in the photo, which appears to be at least a .38 special.
2) "salesman also emphasized the RG’s capacity to accept long-rifle cartridges" -- The salesman was BSing you; virtually all .22s accept the so-called "long rifle" cartridge, which is a very weak (inadequate) cartridge for self defense. You will be hard-pressed to find a weapon chambered for .22 short or another cartridge even weaker than .22 long rifle.
3) You know whether you have drunken fights with friends, or have a small child; if not, these anecdotes are useless.
4) "only 975 deaths caused by civilians using firearms were justifiable homicides" -- an irrelevant fact. You don't measure success in a defensive situation by having a dead perp. One would expect at least three times as many wounded as dead perps; more to the point, the vast majority of the time you use a gun for defense you won't even fire the gun, as most criminals prefer to back off when guns are pointed at them.
— posted 02/03/2013 at 13:57 by David Pittelli
14 |
Horrifying and irresponsible gun disposal!
I enjoyed reading what I felt was a heartfelt narrative. I didn't agree with all of the author's opinions or actions, but they felt honest and he obviously deliberated with what he was doing very seriously.

Then I read this:

"I wrapped the RG in newspaper and stuffed it into an empty milk carton, which I put into a larger bag of household trash. I carried the bag down to the end of my block and dropped it into a street-corner garbage can."

This is absolutely horrifying behavior.

There are many ways to safely and responsibly dispose of a gun. A homeless person is likely to find it in the trash (hint: the density of it doesn't make it shift like regular trash) and this weapon may wind up in the commission of a felony.

My god, it wasn't even a locked trash bin. It was a public trash bin on a street corner. How stupid can a person be?

The author may as well have dropped the gun off at the local playground in a Buzz Lightyear lunchbox.

I sincerely hope his reprehensible behavior does not lead to loss of life, but somehow I hope this is tracked down and the author is made to answer for his willful carelessness in how he disposed of a deadly weapon.

Hal Stucker, I hope this is a work of fiction. Or I hope the serial number on that gun can still be traced back to you so you can be held responsible if your actions cause harm.
— posted 02/03/2013 at 15:17 by Some guy
15 |
WOW!
So you illegally and without training carried an unreliable piece without any holster system or safety training? If carrying were legal you still would be a total menace. You are a conceal carriers worst nightmare. And then to top it off you unloaded your dangerous piece in the garbage? This is disastrous and reveals more about what a dangerous person YOU are rather than anything about firearms. Me, my friends and family have been carrying for years, trained and with care. One armed car jacking prevented but other than that without incident. I'll continue to carry safely, but please stop projecting your strange and dangerous experience with firearms on those of us who treat firearms as any trained professional would. Such trained people account for a large portion of the permitted concealed carriers.
— posted 02/03/2013 at 21:25 by BJOHN
16 |
Your Choice....
I would never force gun ownership onto anyone just as I would want anything else forced onto myself.
Just as you made a choice, albeit illegal one at this time and place, I just want to keep my freedom to let me make that choice.

You carrying a gun for a significant timeframe didn't turn you into a killer, or deranged lunatic.

It appears it gave you the realization that walking through life ignorant of what is happening around you is not the best approach. At the same time it appears that you recognized that it didn't make you go commit murder because of it.

I don't give much daily thought to the fact that I carry some specific tool to defend myself with but the fact that I carry the means to kill another human being makes me much more aware, and avoid situations that even have the slightest chance to escalating to any kinds of confrontation.
Carrying a gun will certainly give you some increased chances of walking away alive from the worst case scenario.
However, nobody who is of average personality, has taken the tests, has read the CWP/self-defense laws placed up on them, looks forward to it exercising that right.
You end up deciding that you are willing to deal with the consequences for the sake of your life or your families life's.
Even if you are totally in your moral and legal right, you still face serious emotional, legal and financial consequences if you ever have to fire you gun in selfdefense.
It is a huge responsibility, one that is not taken lightly by the people who cherish their over all right to own firearms. I would suggest that most don't turn into paranoid extremist but that most are hyper-vigilant not to end up on the wrong side of the law. (even stats support that theory, CWP holders are more lawabiding than the average)

If I look back at situations I underestimated or ignored but still didn't avoid before having a gun one me, is down right scary. Not to mention the times where I had to run for my safety, away from some thug trying to tyrannize me. I no longer underestimate any situation, if anything, the exact opposite.

Carrying the power to take a life on your side is not for everyone and it gives you pause and forces you to reflect on the reality if you are really that person capable of being able to take that step.

I just ask to let me make that choice on my own, in the way I see fit.
— posted 02/03/2013 at 22:22 by Just Leave Me
17 |
While I will be the last person to support illegal or irresponsible gun ownership, I think, I hope, this article was not meant to be about that.

While some of the actions described in the article are difficult or impossible to excuse, especially when there were a multitude of legal and less dangerous ways to accomplish them. I am willing to assume the author put their story into public words for the sake of the overall story, the underlying experience and not the specifics.

One the other hand, if the purpose was to point out how people do uneducated and stupid things every day...I would respectfully suggest not pick a topic directly related to a highly important and very tense conversation in our country, as the basis of such point.

I hope I am not wrong.
— posted 02/03/2013 at 23:29 by Just Leave Me
18 |
In the trash
You put the gun in the trash - that is SO irresponsible. My god, what if a child finds it; there are so many negative scenarios arising out of this action you took.
— posted 02/04/2013 at 05:03 by Russ Harris
19 |
I liked this. I used to have to hitchhike as a teen and I grew up in a violent neighborhood. I ended up carrying a switchblade for some years (I am female) and I still always have a knife. But the switchblade was something of a mind f**k. I was self conscious and it put me in a paranoid mood. It made my fears worse. It was a cheap switchblade and the blade popped out practically if you blew on it. It's a wonder I didn't stab myself by accident. But it was a response to life threatening overwhelming situations, and like I said, I still always carry a knife. (My blade is my friend.) Just because of this experience I knew I would be really bent out of shape with an actual gun. But I have to tell you, where I grew up, concealed carry wasn't that rare. (South Side Chicago in the 70's.) Anyway I could relate. Thanks for sharing. The issue of what it does to your psyche to walk around armed & ready & paranoid is worth thinking about.
— posted 02/04/2013 at 05:15 by dissent
20 |
Another colonial
A lot of good points made here, on both sides. But here in NZ, yes, I think the majority of people are looking on at this "tense debate" in horror. Personally I wish no civvies could get guns. Seems obvious to me that it's safer to not have guns, have less, etc etc. But any of you guys see Michael Moore's Bowling For Columbine? As many guns per capita in Canada as the US, apparently, and a tiny fraction of the gun homicide rate. Lots of guns here in NZ too - but again, a tiny fraction of the homicide rate. Personally, I think NRA-types are nutters (no offence, and yes, I concede there are many responsible gun owners in the US, but it's well established, I believe, that owning a gun makes you and your family MORE likely to get shot (no??) - but whatever whatever. I ain't no left wing freak, but I think MM is right on this. I even think the NRA is not entirely without some sense here - is it really, truly, about the guns? Can anyone explain to me how every non criminal, sane Swiss man has an M-16 in his wardrobe (militia) and yet the Swiss gun homicide rate is negligible?
Like many "tense' conversations, I'm not sure there are any easy answers in this one.
So sorry, so damn sorry, to see these recent slaughters though.
a
— posted 02/04/2013 at 07:02 by Andrew James
21 |
vj, here's my question: has Australia ever had an issue with gun violence in its history (and I'm not talking about one-off massacres like the one in Port Arthur)?

The thing that most non-Americans really don't understand (particularly those who rely wholly on Michael Moore and the like for insight on America) is that, the vast, vast, vast majority of gun violence in the US occurs in the inner cities amongst street gangs, usually over illegal drugs. As long as you stay away from areas where gangs are active and illegal drugs, you're as safe from gun violence in the United States as you are elsewhere in the West.

Frankly, I think that we could cut down enormously on the number of gun deaths in the US by ending the War on Drugs and instituting long, mandatory sentences for crimes committed with guns without infringing on our civil liberties.

And, yeah, Hal Stucker was pretty dumb for throwing his gun into the trash where any idiot could find it. If he didn't want to turn it into the police or sell it to a responsible dealer, he could have easily dissembled the thing and tossed the parts into the ocean.
— posted 02/04/2013 at 21:22 by Armando
22 |
Its no wonder you had so much congitive dissonance. You had to become a law breaker to avoid being a victim from a state that failed one of what you thought was its main tasks.

No wonder you were afraid.

Had you understood that it is your job as a citizen to protect yourself and your property no the States, had you been able to carry legally, had some proper training and maybe had a better gun that the mediocre Rohm 22 it would have been better, less fear, more determination

Also I have to agree with Armando. It was irresponsible of the author to put a working gun in the trash.

In addition to the options Armando mentioned he could have turned it any of the many gun buy backs with no risk.

— posted 02/04/2013 at 22:52 by abprosper
23 |
"is it really, truly, about the guns?"

Andrew James

you hid the nail on the head...it shouldn't be about guns, it should be about violence and crime.

Are you more likely to get shot if there are more guns, sure but as you can see in the UK, with little guns, their violent crime rate is twice that in the US. So less guns don't equate to less crime. Neither does the suicide rate change with less guns, just the methods.
Ban VWs, you will have less VWs in accidents but will you lower total accidents, no.

As you pointed out, other countries have just as many guns and no where near the level of crime.....we need look at that first before wasting everyone's time arguing over banning a piece of metal.
— posted 02/05/2013 at 00:18 by Just Leave Me
24 |
Praise the lord, I've been born again.
This entire piece sounded like a classic born again testimonial. For eight years I lived in deep dark sin the one day I saw the light, Thank You Jesus…..Now just like a former smoker we all have to hear about it.
— posted 02/05/2013 at 01:33 by George Taylor
25 |
Training ... really ?
There were several comments in the article and in the comments about the training police officers receive, implying that untrained civilians are necessarily less competent.

Anyone who thinks that has not been paying attention. Members of the NYPD routinely fire for insufficient reason, using too many rounds aimed too poorly. Their fire discipline would get them court-martialed if they were in the armed forces.

— posted 02/05/2013 at 04:42 by NYPD skeptic
26 |
Taxicab Confession
I've driven a cab for a total of 12 years, all in big cities and mostly at night. I have been robbed a few times. Never, not once did I think a gun would improve the siuation.

The only time I thought a gun would make a situation better was after working a twelve hour shift and making barely enough to buy a tank of gas. But tomorrow is always another day.
— posted 02/06/2013 at 18:13 by Bea Foroni
27 |
Peacenik
"She and I married and moved to San Francisco shortly thereafter"
(You don't say?)

"I’d moved there in 1977 to study art at the Pratt Institute"
(Get out.)

" I had shoulder-length hair and wore an army jacket with a peace flag embroidered over the left breast pocket."
(Shocked I tell ya.)
— posted 02/08/2013 at 02:07 by Joe
28 |
8 years of stupidity finally ended
A cheap gun carried in an unsafe manner by a person stupid enough to discard it in a public trash can? I am a CCW holder and support gun rights but I can only hope the author will somehow be arrested for breaking so many laws and endangering so many citizens. He is the exact opposit of me, my fellow CCW permit holders and he needs to get his ass kicked by the nefarious NYPD. And vj? Can you take this American away please. You two would get along fabulously. Ignoramus'. Geez.
— posted 02/08/2013 at 04:51 by David
29 |
American exceptionalism
I find it bizarre that USAnians think they live in a "dangerous" country filled with a "violent and criminal underclass". Go get a passport and see some of the world - then you'll really discover what that phrase means. You'll find countries with more fewer guns and less crime (violent or not). Countries with fewer guns yet more crime. And also as many guns and more crime (though possibly only Yemen matches you in number of guns around). Then you'll figure out that you aren't so special, that your country is actually a reasonably safe place, overall. That all your guns are probably making things worse.

(If you want to know my credentials for speaking about a "violent and criminal underclass", you should come to South Africa sometime. I'll even show you around town if you want. Without a gun.)
— posted 02/08/2013 at 15:33 by Bernd Jendrissek
30 |
Stucker was irresponsible: and that's why he is important
I note with interest the many commenters who are berating Hal Stucker for his illegal concealed carrying, his lack of training, and his improper disposal of his gun. No doubt Stucker was not a "responsible" gun owner.

But don't you see that that is the point? There are lots of Hal Stuckers. There may be more Hal Stuckers than Hunter Joes. The easy accessibility of guns means that anyone, no matter how irresponsible, can have one. THIS is the problem. You're not going to change the fact that some people who own guns shouldn't, and that is why guns are not a safe tool to make readily available.

The notion that Stucker was irresponsible and therefore has nothing to say is precisely wrong. It is just because he is a normal person who behaved badly with a gun that we should heed his warning and reevaluate our societal approach to guns.

If you dismiss the lessons of this article because you are a responsible gun owner and Stucker wasn't, then you are simply missing the point. Stucker is a real person who really owned a gun. We're lucky that he came to understand that he could not trust himself with a gun. But we aren't always lucky.

Responsible gun owners always seem to think that they are proof that guns are safe and should be allowed in society with minimal regulation. Wrong. We need strong gun laws because many gun owners are just like Stucker. The responsible ones don't matter.
— posted 02/08/2013 at 15:42 by Pat
31 |
In contrast...
Faced with very similar circumstances, I chose the other option.

During roughly the same time period as you wrote about, I lived three blocks from Cobrini Green. After wrestling with the whether or not to buy a gun, I made the decision that I would not. During the almost two years that I lived there, I had a few unpleasant incidents but none that would have required me to use a firearm.

Before that time, I had lived in a few pretty tough neighborhoods in Boston, had spent almost a year in Buena Park (LA) and seen several violent encounters - but not once ever feeling as though I would have been safer had I carried a gun.

Yes, this is anecdotal and I readily admit that my experiences are unique and do not represent what many other people have encountered. However, at fifty-seven years old and having lived a lifestyle that pushed too close to the edge more times than I would care to admit, there has never been a time in my life where I felt where a gun was needed. I fervently hope that this belief in my safety continues.

Thanks for the article, it was thought-provoking as well as illuminated how people like you lived by choosing the opposite of what I decided to do.
— posted 02/08/2013 at 18:30 by Ken
32 |
Thank you, Hal
I am grateful to you for having the courage to write and have published this sobering essay on the psychology of fear-based gun ownership in a time and place where guns are treated as a sacred right.

Those trying to defend the very expensive right to bear arms in the USA need to counter, with verifiable data, the damning daily toll that this irrational tolerance for guns is inflicting on so many innocents. If the numbers are there, the daily outpouring of "a gun saved my child today" stories should be easy for the massive NRA membership to post for the rest of us to Google. A "guns save lives" equivalent should be overwhelming @GunDeaths on Twitter, as proud concealed weapons holders brag about the children who are saved day in and day out only because of that thick red line of NRA members who make our police redundant. Until that alternative universe is proven to exist, please stop insisting on your right as smokers to "light up responsibly" at the gas station.
— posted 02/08/2013 at 23:48 by dakotan
33 |
Interesting article, but of litle practical use.
The key to avoiding violence is to stay away from low IQ areas that are known for violence.
— posted 02/10/2013 at 19:56 by Doug
34 |
Surprisingly good
Well written with some decent amount of perspective.

My one thought upon reading it that I was surprised the author didn't address was the likelihood that carrying the gun also had the effect of taking him out of the category of potential victims.

I was particularly surprised because the subway anecdote comes vanishingly close to confirming it. Two attacks pre-gun. A predator leaves him alone post-gun. And, pure speculation, but who knows how many criminals saw him in and waited for the next guy instead because of his posture, eye contact, and general bearing -- all of which he now had because he was carrying.

Anyway, good article marred only slightly by the nutty commenters on both sides who are positive that they and they alone have access to Truth and what is Right.
— posted 02/12/2013 at 00:20 by hp
35 |
I don't trust myself with a gun...
But that's just me. I see no reason to take that right away from everyone else. We do have a lot of violent criminals in this country. Maybe we never should have had all these guns floating around, but since we do, nothing wrong with an honest citizen wanting one to protect himself.
— posted 02/12/2013 at 23:27 by SFG
36 |
Not that this comment will be approved, but, of course the author and editors don't care to mention how many of the brutal crimes he discusses were committed by blacks.

I wonder why not?
— posted 03/30/2013 at 04:03 by JasonM
37 |
brendapopular
Thanks for your sharing
— posted 04/25/2013 at 08:03 by brendapopular
38 |
The author moved to a safer neighborhood and now supports further disarmament of less fortunate people who have no choice but to live in lousy neighborhoods. He should be ashamed of himself.
— posted 04/27/2013 at 20:19 by FellowBrooklynite
Name
E-mail (Will not appear online)
Title
Comment
To prevent automated Bots from spamming, please enter the text you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.



Powered by Comment Script
del.ici.ous  stumbleUpon  Reddit  Facebook    Digg   RSS Feed Icon

About the Author

Hal Stucker is a writer and photographer. His work has appeared in Wired, the New York Times, Photo District News, and the book Black Star: 60 Years of Photojournalism.

Bruce Western,
Crime and Punishment

Pamela S. Karlan,
In the Beginning

Donald Pfarrer,
American Fighter

Alan A. Stone,
Cheap Shots (archive)


   



Boston Review Newsletter