Is Equal Opportunity Enough?
Equal opportunity is a widely shared ideal. As Joe Biden put it in his first executive order as president, “equal opportunity is the bedrock of American democracy.”
But is equal opportunity enough? Does it truly capture the meaning of equality? In a neoliberal age that prizes personal responsibility and individual merit, the ideal has been increasingly called into question. Taking equality seriously, critics argue, means aiming to ensure that we all live equally flourishing lives—not merely that we have equal shots at upward mobility. That means rethinking a range of social institutions, from education and land ownership to finance and neighborhood development. Featuring work by philosophers and economists, historians and sociologists, this issue explores the importance of outcomes, not just opportunities.
Part of our Opportunity after Neoliberalism series.
Forum: Is Equal Opportunity Enough?
Opening
Being serious about equality means aiming to ensure we all live equally flourishing lives—not merely that we have the chance to do so.
Essays
Institutional reform is no match for pervasive structural inequality.
Redistributing land was once central to global development efforts—and it should be today.
Tax breaks for investors don’t help poor communities. Rather than court venture capital, cities must build new institutions to grow neighborhood wealth.
Two new books critique poverty capital, but they don’t ask what borrowers need.
