Help Us Stay Paywall-Free

We rely on readers to keep our website open to all. Help sustain a public space for collective reasoning and imagination—make a tax-deductible donation today.

Max Horkheimer (center left), Theodor Adorno (center right), and Jürgen Habermas (far right) at the Max Weber Institute for Sociology in Heidelberg, 1964. Wikimedia Commons

January 20, 2023

A Century of the Frankfurt School

The Institute for Social Research was founded one hundred years ago. We ignore its prescient theorists at our peril.

2023 marks one hundred years since the founding of the Institute for Social Research. Better known today as the Frankfurt School, the Institute’s theorists—among them Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, and Jürgen Habermas—established a reputation as trenchant and sophisticated analysts of twentieth-century capitalism. Recent trends have also underscored their prescience.

Consider Prophets of Deceit, a 1949 study of the “techniques of the American agitator” by less familiar Frankfurt associates Leo Löwenthal and Norbert Guterman. According to intellectual historian Charles H. Clavey, the strategies discussed in Prophets—scapegoating immigrants, developing conspiracy theories, and cultivating a sense of persecution—foretold Donald Trump and his imitators. Trump may have lost the 2020 election, but the “social malaise” that enabled his rise persists. “Perhaps the most important lesson to be gotten from reading Prophets in the age of Trump,” Clavey concludes, “is that he is not an exception to postwar U.S. society but rather its inevitable fulfillment.”

For philosopher Seyla Benhabib, the ascendance of global right-wing nationalism and the sharpening of great power rivalries highlights the need to put “critical inquiry once more in the service of autonomy and emancipation,” as Horkheimer intended with his original 1937 formulation of critical theory’s mission. Unwilling to give in to “today’s widespread ‘left-wing melancholia,’” Benhabib argues that the “task of critique is interminable; it needs to confront ever-new forms of injustice, oppression, exploitation, and marginalization.”

Other essays on this week’s list include Vivian Gornick on Lawrence J. Friedman’s “thoroughly absorbing” biography of Erich Fromm; Peter Gordon on the left’s “shattered dreams”; Ronald Aronson on the fiftieth anniversary of Marcuse’s One-Dimensional Man; John Merrick on the fragility of progress; Andy Battle’s Benjaminian interpretation of the 1974 British cult classic Penda’s Fen; and much more.

 

Ronald Aronson

Fifty years later, One-Dimensional Man looks more prescient than its author could have imagined.

William E. Scheuerman

A new biography reveals Habermas's commitment to a democratic ideal.

Charles H. Clavey

The Frankfurt School on the appeal of authoritarianism—and how to counteract it.

Seyla Benhabib

There is still much to learn from the radical legacy of critical theory.

Vivian Gornick

The Lives of Erich Fromm.

Peter E. Gordon

Why the left needs melancholy.

Andy Battle

In the 1974 cult-classic teleplay Penda’s Fen, the past holds the key to escaping the catastrophic present.

Jonathan White

Is a centralized European Union compatible with democracy?

Brandon Bloch

In a sweeping history of Western philosophy, Jürgen Habermas narrates the progress of humanity through the unfolding of public reason.

John Merrick

Pestilence and plague have often prompted waves of apocalyptic thinking, calling into question the steady march of progress in human history.

Our weekly themed Reading Lists compile the best of Boston Review’s archive. Sign up for our newsletters to get them straight to your inbox before they appear online.

Boston Review is nonprofit and reader funded.

We believe in the power of collective reasoning and imagination to create a more just world. That’s why we’re committed to keeping our website free and open to everyone, regardless of ability to pay. But we can’t do it without the financial support of our readers.

Help sustain a public space for collective reasoning and imagination, without ads or paywalls:

Become a supporting reader today.

Get Our Newsletter

Sign up to get vital reading on politics, literature, and more sent straight to your inbox.

Most Recent

Lewis Gordon and Nathalie Etoke discuss the space for freedom opened up by Black existentialist thought.

Nathalie Etoke, Lewis Gordon

The post-work movement reckons with reproductive labor.

Rachel Fraser

Melvin Rogers and Neil Roberts discuss the difficulty of keeping faith in a foundationally anti-Black republic.

Melvin Rogers, Neil Roberts

Just in time for the holidays, get any three print issues of Boston Review for just $35 – that’s 40% off the cover price!

Before December 9, mix and match any three issues for one low price using code 3FOR35.

Just in time for the holidays, get any three print issues of Boston Review for just $35 – that’s 40% off the cover price!

Before December 9, mix and match any three issues for one low price using code 3FOR35.

We can't publish without your support.

For nearly 50 years, Boston Review has been a home for collective reasoning and imagination on behalf of a more just world.

But our future is never guaranteed. As a small, independent nonprofit, we have no endowment or single funder. We rely on contributions from readers like you to sustain our work.

If you appreciate what we publish and want to help ensure a future for the great writing and constructive debate that appears in our pages, please make a tax-deductible donation today.

"An indispensable pillar of the public sphere."

That’s what sociologist Alondra Nelson says of Boston Review. Independent and nonprofit, we believe in the power of collective reasoning and imagination to create a more just world.

That’s why there are no paywalls on our website, but we can’t do it without the support of our readers. Please make a tax-deductible donation to help us create a more inclusive and egalitarian public sphere—open to everyone, regardless of ability to pay.