Help Us Stay Paywall-Free

We rely on readers to keep our website open to all. Help sustain a public space for collective reasoning and imagination—make a tax-deductible donation today.

October/November 2001

A debate on the future of voting technology with Stephen Ansolabehere, Lloyd Cutler, Robert Michel, Donna Brazile, and others. Josh Cohen interviews missile defense critic Ted Postol. James Campbell on the troubled history of the Nobel Prize for literature; James Sallis on the Collected Stories of Patricia Highsmith. Plus, Calvin Bedient reviews Frederick Seidel; fiction by Mary Hanna, poetry by James Tate and D. A. Powell; John Summers on Louis Menand’s The Metaphysical Club, and more.

 

Forum 

Machine Politics 
CHANGING THE WAY WE VOTE IS MORE URGENT—AND LESS COMPLICATED—THAN YOU THINK
STEPHEN ANSOLABEHERE
RESPONSES FROM LLOYD CUTLER & ROBERT MICHEL, ROGERS M. SMITH, DONNA BRAZILE, DAVID C. KING, DANIEL R. ORTIZ, E. JOSHUA ROSENKRANZ, ROBERT RICHIE, HEATHER GERKEN, MICKEY EDWARDS, MARC STRASSMAN, AND ROBERT RICHIE. STEPHEN ANSOLABEHERE REPLIES.

Interview

An interview with Ted Postol
Joshua Cohen
Fiction
Mary Hanna
New Fiction Forum
The troubled history of literature’s “gold standard”
James Campbell
James Sallis
Tom Bissell
Poetry
Introduced by Carl Phillips
Introduced by Bruce Andrew
Karen Zusman
James Tate
Jennifer Scappettone
Laurie Sheck
Brett Fletcher Lauer
P.F. Potvin
Joshua Bell
David Lehman
On Film
The odyssey of China’s premier director
Alan A. Stone

Boston Review is nonprofit and reader funded.

We believe in the power of collective reasoning and imagination to create a more just world. That’s why we’re committed to keeping our website free and open to everyone, regardless of ability to pay. But we can’t do it without the financial support of our readers.

Help sustain a public space for collective reasoning and imagination, without ads or paywalls:

Become a supporting reader today.

Sign Up for Our
Newsletter

Vital reading on politics, literature, and more in your inbox. Sign up for our Weekly Newsletter, Monthly Roundup, and event notifications.

We can't publish without your support.

For nearly 50 years, Boston Review has been a home for collective reasoning and imagination on behalf of a more just world.

But our future is never guaranteed. As a small, independent nonprofit, we have no endowment or single funder. We rely on contributions from readers like you to sustain our work.

If you appreciate what we publish and want to help ensure a future for the great writing and constructive debate that appears in our pages, please make a tax-deductible donation today.

"An indispensable pillar of the public sphere."

That’s what sociologist Alondra Nelson says of Boston Review. Independent and nonprofit, we believe in the power of collective reasoning and imagination to create a more just world.

That’s why there are no paywalls on our website, but we can’t do it without the support of our readers. Please make a tax-deductible donation to help us create a more inclusive and egalitarian public sphere—open to everyone, regardless of ability to pay.