Help Us Stay Paywall-Free

We rely on readers to keep our website open to all. Help sustain a public space for collective reasoning and imagination—make a tax-deductible donation today.

February 20, 2022

Where Egalitarianism Went Wrong

—and what it still has to offer. A reading list on equality, Rawls, and the struggle for a more just world.

A regular reader of Boston Review (which he called “a jewel”), John Rawls was among the most influential political philosophers of the twentieth century. On last year’s centenary, Rawls student and BR co-editor-in-chief Joshua Cohen compiled and introduced a special reading list of Rawlsian essays, including one from Rawls himself. Today’s reading list extends a Rawlsian concern with justice through the lens of debates about egalitarianism: the school of philosophical thought that takes equality as its guiding ideal.

Egalitarianism has always been a central component of BR’s editorial agenda, and our archive features several rich essays dealing with egalitarian themes. In a classic essay from 2000, philosopher Stuart White charts a debate over the personal and the political dimensions of equality, mapping the contours of a striking ethical turn in egalitarian thought—away from the laws and institutions that were Rawls’s focus, toward a focus on morality and the good life. Other archival essays, including work by Martin O’Neill and Thad Williamson, consider the merits of different strains of egalitarianism and the various meanings of equality, while a forum led by economists Herbert Gintis and Samuel Bowles argues that an egalitarian agenda is not only morally necessary but also politically feasible.

But the key inspiration for today’s reading list comes from political theorist Teresa M. Bejan’s recent review of Anne Phillips’s new book, Unconditional Equals. In her book, Phillips confronts a renewed wave of disaffection with the ideal of equality—even among progressives, many of whom have argued, in the face of stubborn inequalities of wealth and power, that equality talk is cheap. In the face of this skepticism, Phillips explores where egalitarian theory went wrong and what it still has to offer. She centers her critique, in particular, on dichotomous approaches to egalitarianism, arguing that the separation of “formal” from “substantive” equality impedes the realization of a more just world.

“The division suggests that formal equality must necessarily give way, in the long run, to more substantive varieties—in other words, that a truly egalitarian society is simply a matter of time,” Bejan writes. “But this presumption of progress is just another way of saying that the time for equal rights is now, but the time for a society of equals—in which all enjoy equality of socioeconomic security and standing—is ‘not yet.’” Instead, Phillips argues that the equality of human beings is not a philosophical truth to be “justified” but a political achievement to be realized in practice.

Amidst today’s revitalized debates over the meaning of equality, these essays show how egalitarianism remains an essential philosophical resource in the struggle for a more just world:

 

 

 

  • Is Equality Passé? a forum with Herbert Gintis and Samuel Bowles
    The welfare state is in trouble not because selfishness is rampant (it is not), but because many egalitarian programs no longer evoke deeply held notions of fairness.

 

  • What We Owe Each Other by Martin O’Neill
    T. M. Scanlon’s ideas about equality are philosophically significant. They also have the potential to inform how we ought to approach day-to-day politics.

 

 

  • Inequality Is Not Our Fate by Stuart White
    “There is much we can do to create a more egalitarian economy and, in the process, a freer way of life. But the ambition to reshape and transcend capitalism needs to join with the struggle to renew representative democracy. Egalitarians need more discussion not just of policy but of politics and the democratic state.”

 

  • MLK Now a forum with Brandon M. Terry
    Canonization has prevented a reckoning with the substance of King’s intellectual, ethical, and political commitments—he has become an icon to quote, not a thinker and public philosopher to engage.

 

 

 

  • Rawls at 100 a reading list from Joshua Cohen
    We celebrate the political philosopher’s centenary, as well as the 50th anniversary of the publication of “A Theory of Justice.”

 

  • Bostock v. BLM by Aziz Z. Huq
    “This new fissure is not solely a matter of differing conceptions of equality. Rather, it forces us to question how much of the social and economic world we hold constant when demanding equality.”

Our weekly themed Reading Lists compile the best of Boston Review’s archive. Sign up for our newsletters to get them straight to your inbox before they appear online.

Boston Review is nonprofit and reader funded.

We believe in the power of collective reasoning and imagination to create a more just world. That’s why we’re committed to keeping our website free and open to everyone, regardless of ability to pay. But we can’t do it without the financial support of our readers.

Help sustain a public space for collective reasoning and imagination, without ads or paywalls:

Become a supporting reader today.

Get Our Newsletter

Sign up to get vital reading on politics, literature, and more sent straight to your inbox.

While we have you...

Most Recent

On the situation in Germany in the wake of October 7.

Lewis Gordon and Nathalie Etoke discuss the space for freedom opened up by Black existentialist thought.

Nathalie Etoke, Lewis Gordon

The post-work movement reckons with reproductive labor.

Rachel Fraser

Just in time for the holidays, get any three print issues of Boston Review for just $35 – that’s 40% off the cover price!

Before December 9, mix and match any three issues for one low price using code 3FOR35.

Just in time for the holidays, get any three print issues of Boston Review for just $35 – that’s 40% off the cover price!

Before December 9, mix and match any three issues for one low price using code 3FOR35.

"An indispensable pillar of the public sphere."

That’s what sociologist Alondra Nelson says of Boston Review. Independent and nonprofit, we believe in the power of collective reasoning and imagination to create a more just world.

That’s why there are no paywalls on our website, but we can’t do it without the support of our readers. Please make a tax-deductible donation to help us create a more inclusive and egalitarian public sphere—open to everyone, regardless of ability to pay.