Help Us Stay Paywall-Free

We rely on readers to keep our website open to all. Help sustain a public space for collective reasoning and imagination—make a tax-deductible donation today.

March 14, 2021

Women Philosophers: A Reading List

We celebrate International Women’s Day.

We are thrilled to hear that regular Boston Review contributor Martha Nussbaum is the recipient of the 2021 Holberg Prize! A prestigious international honor, the Holberg Prize is awarded annually to a scholar who has made outstanding contributions to research in the humanities. “Truly a ‘public philosopher’, Nussbaum’s work has reached wide audiences across the world as well as influenced many areas of knowledge,” the selection committee commented. “Her writing is always scrupulous about arguments, perceptive about human emotions and vulnerability, and attentive to the realities of human situations, social interactions, and the many forms of dependence and interdependence that can arise within them.” Congratulations, Martha! 

This news coincided with the celebration of International Women’s Day earlier this week, which is itself the capstone of Women’s History Month. To mark these occasions, today’s reading list highlights women thinkers from a range of philosophical traditions. The list includes Boston Review favorites Agnes Callard and Seyla Benhabib—on decision-making and philosophical truths respectively—as well as political philosophers Elizabeth Anderson and Katrina Forrester looking at the history of social insurance and the future of Rawlsian liberalism. 

Nussbaum and Danielle Allen represent the ethicists, looking at the relationship between mourning and justice and the importance of civic agency, and questions of moral philosophy come to the fore in essays by F. M Kamm and the inimitable Judith Jarvis Thomspon. While the latter is most famous for her ‘unconscious violinist’ thought experiment, here she pivots her arguments on abortion to the realm of rights, arguing that “the idea that a fetus has rights cannot be bypassed as nonsense. We have to take it seriously.”

Judith Jarvis Thomson

The idea that a fetus has rights cannot be bypassed as nonsense. We have to take the idea seriously.

Seyla Benhabib
Can we distinguish political choices from philosophical truths?
Danielle Allen

Preparation for democratic citizenship demands humanities education, not just STEM.

F. M. Kamm
A moral defense.
Elizabeth Anderson

How did we come to view social insurance as socialist?

Kate Manne
Moralistic or not, misogyny is not about hating women. It is about controlling them.
Katrina Forrester

For five decades Anglophone political philosophy has been dominated by the liberal egalitarianism of John Rawls. With liberalism in crisis, have these ideas outlived their time?

Agnes Callard
A new book wants us to navigate life’s crossroads with the precision of a military exercise. But personal decisions are more difficult than even the most consequential political decisions.
Martha C. Nussbaum

Martha Nussbaum’s bat mitzvah talk, on grief and the foundations of justice.

Our weekly themed Reading Lists compile the best of Boston Review’s archive. Sign up for our newsletters to get them straight to your inbox before they appear online.

Boston Review is nonprofit and reader funded.

We believe in the power of collective reasoning and imagination to create a more just world. That’s why we’re committed to keeping our website free and open to everyone, regardless of ability to pay. But we can’t do it without the financial support of our readers.

Help sustain a public space for collective reasoning and imagination, without ads or paywalls:

Become a supporting reader today.

Get Our Newsletter

Sign up to get vital reading on politics, literature, and more sent straight to your inbox.

Most Recent

Lewis Gordon and Nathalie Etoke discuss the space for freedom opened up by Black existentialist thought.

Nathalie Etoke, Lewis Gordon

The post-work movement reckons with reproductive labor.

Rachel Fraser

Melvin Rogers and Neil Roberts discuss the difficulty of keeping faith in a foundationally anti-Black republic.

Melvin Rogers, Neil Roberts

Just in time for the holidays, get any three print issues of Boston Review for just $35 – that’s 40% off the cover price!

Before December 9, mix and match any three issues for one low price using code 3FOR35.

Just in time for the holidays, get any three print issues of Boston Review for just $35 – that’s 40% off the cover price!

Before December 9, mix and match any three issues for one low price using code 3FOR35.

We can't publish without your support.

For nearly 50 years, Boston Review has been a home for collective reasoning and imagination on behalf of a more just world.

But our future is never guaranteed. As a small, independent nonprofit, we have no endowment or single funder. We rely on contributions from readers like you to sustain our work.

If you appreciate what we publish and want to help ensure a future for the great writing and constructive debate that appears in our pages, please make a tax-deductible donation today.

"An indispensable pillar of the public sphere."

That’s what sociologist Alondra Nelson says of Boston Review. Independent and nonprofit, we believe in the power of collective reasoning and imagination to create a more just world.

That’s why there are no paywalls on our website, but we can’t do it without the support of our readers. Please make a tax-deductible donation to help us create a more inclusive and egalitarian public sphere—open to everyone, regardless of ability to pay.