Help Us Stay Paywall-Free

We rely on readers to keep our website open to all. Help sustain a public space for collective reasoning and imagination—make a tax-deductible donation today.

Image: Bread for the World / Flickr

October 14, 2022

The Value of Care Work

Without it, society would fall apart.

The COVID-19 pandemic has taught us many lessons, but one of its most important is the essential role of care work in our society. Yet despite its centrality to social cohesion and reproduction, care work is habitually undervalued. Those who do it—mothers, nurses, teachers, social workers, domestic caregivers, and many others—are often paid little or no wages, their labor taken for granted by a society that relies on it.

The activism of Wages for Housework aimed to show us that undervaluing care endangers us all. In an essay about the movement and Selma James’s influential role in it, historian Emily Callaci argues that we must conjure a world “organized around care rather than capitalist growth.” Bringing James’s ideas to bear on our present crises, Callaci explains how “James and her community of organizers have more recently invoked ‘care work’ as a more expansive concept.” This involves applying the animating goal of feminism—liberation—to all, regardless of gender. It also advances a notion of care and feminism that is “less tethered to the nuclear family.”

This sentiment is echoed by socialist feminist thinker Lynne Segal, who argues that “earlier feminist demands for the sharing of caring responsibilities, alongside the necessary resources and welfare provision to enrich our households and communities, are now more urgent than ever.” According to Segal, the necessity of care work can form the basis for a desperately needed utopian politics that puts social and ecological needs before those of economic growth. “Understanding that we all depend on each other encourages us to work to cultivate a world in which each of us can not only live, but thrive,” she writes. “The pleasure of acting in concert to assert our need for each other and our natural world can, and must, hold us together in the challenging years ahead.”

As the other essays on this week’s reading list demonstrate, the politics of care manifest themselves in diverse ways—from racial injustice in medical care and the need for a more robust public health infrastructure to the unequal burdens of childcare and motherhood. The gendered nature of care is reflected in the way the tech sector designs new apps, while the pleasures of ordinary caring duties acquire radical political significance in a society still permeated by racism. Together, these pieces show that, until we acknowledge the value of care and begin to make it more equitable, our collective liberation will remain out of reach.

Jennifer C. Nash

Freedom means a world where how I parent is simply mundane rather than overburdened with meaning. 

Emily Callaci

Selma James’s work with the Wages for Housework movement shows that we ignore the labor of care at our own peril.

Judith Levine
Some feminists think we can improve motherhood. But what if abolishing it is the only way to alleviate its problems?
Silvia Federici, Jill Richards

Silvia Federici interviewed by Jill Richards.

Amy Kapczynski, Gregg Gonsalves
The right response to COVID-19 is to rebuild our economy from the ground up, putting people to work in a massive jobs program to secure the public health of all.
Sarah Sharma

From laundry to meal prep, apps tend to mimic maternal care. Is this good for women?

Joan Tronto

Care is not only the concern of the young and infirm. Everyone needs and uses care.

Robin D. G. Kelley
As a culture of protest took hold in 1960s LA, communities of color also prioritized a radical tradition of care, emphasizing mutual aid, community control, and the transformative power of art and politics.
Ruha Benjamin, Bram Wispelwey, Michelle Morse, Dorothy Roberts

A recording and transcript of our event on inequities in medicine and child welfare.

Our weekly themed Reading Lists compile the best of Boston Review’s archive. Sign up for our newsletters to get them straight to your inbox before they appear online.

Boston Review is nonprofit and reader funded.

We believe in the power of collective reasoning and imagination to create a more just world. That’s why we’re committed to keeping our website free and open to everyone, regardless of ability to pay. But we can’t do it without the financial support of our readers.

Help sustain a public space for collective reasoning and imagination, without ads or paywalls:

Become a supporting reader today.

Get Our Newsletter

Sign up to get vital reading on politics, literature, and more sent straight to your inbox.

Most Recent

How U.S. laws—branding Palestinians as “terrorists” and redefining anti-Semitism—serve Israel’s interests.

Maryam Jamshidi

Israel's weaponization of images since October 7 obfuscates its genocidal campaign against Palestinians.

Ariella Azoulay
Thad Williamson

Just in time for the holidays, get any three print issues of Boston Review for just $35 – that’s 40% off the cover price!

Before December 9, mix and match any three issues for one low price using code 3FOR35.

Just in time for the holidays, get any three print issues of Boston Review for just $35 – that’s 40% off the cover price!

Before December 9, mix and match any three issues for one low price using code 3FOR35.

"An indispensable pillar of the public sphere."

That’s what sociologist Alondra Nelson says of Boston Review. Independent and nonprofit, we believe in the power of collective reasoning and imagination to create a more just world.

That’s why there are no paywalls on our website, but we can’t do it without the support of our readers. Please make a tax-deductible donation to help us create a more inclusive and egalitarian public sphere—open to everyone, regardless of ability to pay.