Nuclear weapons strategy in the United States is designed around “presidential first use,” an arrangement that enables one man, the president, to kill and maim many millions of people in a single afternoon. What legal or philosophical principle differentiates the moral wrong that would be attributed to a terrorist, non-state actor, or hacker who delivered a nuclear weapon from the presidential launch of a nuclear weapon?
A conference held at Harvard University in November 2017 brought together international scholars and political leaders to examine the nature of presidential first use in the United States. Watch highlights from the conference below.
Co-chairs: Elaine Scarry and Jonathan King
Speakers: Bruce Ackerman, Kennette Benedict, Bruce Blair, Sissela Bok, Rosa Brooks, John Burroughs, Hugh Gusterson, Ed Markey, Jim McGovern, Zia Mian, and William Perry
Co-sponsors: Harvard’s Mahindra Humanities Center, Harvard’s Office of the Dean of Arts and Humanities, Mass Peace Action, Institute for People’s Engagement and Union of Concerned Scientists
Donate to support work like this:
Related Articles
Poor Historians
In the state’s twisted logic, being a victim of violence is reason for deportation.
Joshua Craze
The Making of the Deportation Machine
The pillars aren’t new. They were built over decades, with bipartisan consensus.
Marie Gottschalk
What Are We Living Through?
Three competing narratives of the second Trump administration.
Jedediah Britton-Purdy
David Pozen
trending_flat
Get our newsletter
Vital reading on politics, ideas, and culture to your inbox
A political and literary forum, independent and nonprofit since 1975