Help Us Stay Paywall-Free

We rely on readers to keep our website open to all. Help sustain a public space for collective reasoning and imagination—make a tax-deductible donation today.

Smart robot arms engaged in manufacturing.

Image: xiaoliangge

May 19, 2023

AI and the Specter of Automation

In a just world, productivity-enhancing technology would create more leisure and prosperity for everyone.

To fear AI or to embrace it? That is the question many are asking as machine learning and large language models excel at accomplishing ever more sophisticated tasks. 

Of the reasons for fear, perhaps the most frequently cited is that AI will put vast swaths of people out of work. But this is also a possible reason to embrace it: in a just world, productivity-enhancing technology would eliminate onerous jobs and create more leisure and prosperity for everyone. Indeed, for economist Daron Acemoglu, AI’s implications need not be dystopian. In the past, rising productivity associated with technological innovation has promoted good jobs and higher wages, foiling predictions of “technological unemployment.” This virtuous circle was not the inevitable result of market forces, however. As Acemoglu points out, strong labor market institutions and a democratic political system helped ensure that the technologically produced prosperity of the post–World War II era was shared. “The argument that we should rely on the market for setting the direction of technological change is weak,” Acemoglu writes. “Government policy, funding, and leadership are critical” if we want to direct AI’s development toward progressive rather than dystopian ends. 

One of the ways that AI can be guided toward more benevolent applications is by focusing on its potential to complement rather than replace labor, argues economist Erik Brynjolfsson. Responding to Acemoglu, Brynjolfsson writes that “when technology complements labor, wages tend to rise, creating more broadly shared prosperity.” Harnessing AI’s potential to “augment” labor requires working with “managers, entrepreneurs, worker representatives, and other business leaders” to answer the question “how can technology and people work together to create novel sources of value?”

With respect to workers, this means providing them with more on-the-job training, writes city planning scholar Nichola Lowe, something that employers often overlook. “Many employers have been either unwilling or unable to invest sufficient resources into work-based learning and the creation of skill-rewarding career paths that extend economic opportunity to workers on the lowest rungs of the labor market,” Lowe argues. Through “more robust forms of intermediation,” including union-sponsored training programs and publicly funded technology centers, “employers can learn there is value to having front-line workers continually participate in technological decisions and development.”

Other essays on this week’s list consider technology’s implications for labor from a variety of perspectives. Looking at the issue historically, Justin Vassallo traces the global ramifications of Fordist mass production; sociologist Claude Fischer reviews economist Robert Gordon’s The Rise and Fall of American Growth; political theorist David Moscrop draws on the ideas of the Frankfurt School to analyze the social and political implications of automation; philosopher Philippe Van Parijs and labor law scholar Brishen Rogers make the case for basic income, which is frequently presented as a solution to the threat of technological unemployment; sociologist Anna Romina Guevarra examines the uses of automation in healthcare; and more.

Daron Acemoglu

AI can be used to increase human productivity, create jobs and shared prosperity, and protect and bolster democratic freedoms—but only if we modify our approach.

Erik Brynjolfsson
When it comes to AI’s effect on the workforce, the real challenge is wages, not jobs.
Nichola Lowe
To support the work of the future, we must promote workers’ skills as crucial to technological progress.
Justin H. Vassallo

A new history charts the global legacy of Fordist mass production, tracing its appeal to political formations on both the left and the right.

Claude S. Fischer

Government has always played an outsize role in creating jobs—and still can.

David Moscrop

The philosopher Herbert Marcuse saw machines as our greatest hope for real liberty. But in Trump’s America, automation feels more totalitarian than ever. 

Philippe Van Parijs

It's the best way to secure real freedom and justice for everyone.

Brishen Rogers

Cash grants have a role to play in building a decent future for work—alongside much else.

Anna Romina Guevarra

The pandemic increased demand and possibilities for automating care, but doing so may deliver racist stereotypes and unemployment for women of color.

Thomas A. Kochan

We should turn to Frances Perkins—FDR’s secretary of labor, and the first woman to serve in the U.S. Cabinet—for the elements of a new forward-looking labor and employment policy.

David McDermott Hughes

A rural town in Spain gives us a glimpse into the challenges we will face in a workless future.

Erin L. Kelly, Emilio J. Castilla, Thomas A. Kochan, Barbara Dyer, Paul Osterman, Nathan Wilmers

Workers deserve substantive policy reforms that point the way to a better future, especially in this year of unprecedented crisis.

Our weekly themed Reading Lists compile the best of Boston Review’s archive. Sign up for our newsletters to get them straight to your inbox before they appear online.

Boston Review is nonprofit and reader funded.

We believe in the power of collective reasoning and imagination to create a more just world. That’s why we’re committed to keeping our website free and open to everyone, regardless of ability to pay. But we can’t do it without the financial support of our readers.

Help sustain a public space for collective reasoning and imagination, without ads or paywalls:

Become a supporting reader today.

Get Our Newsletter

Sign up to get vital reading on politics, literature, and more sent straight to your inbox.

Most Recent

How U.S. laws—branding Palestinians as “terrorists” and redefining anti-Semitism—serve Israel’s interests.

Maryam Jamshidi

Israel's weaponization of images since October 7 obfuscates its genocidal campaign against Palestinians.

Ariella Azoulay
Thad Williamson

Just in time for the holidays, get any three print issues of Boston Review for just $35 – that’s 40% off the cover price!

Before December 9, mix and match any three issues for one low price using code 3FOR35.

Just in time for the holidays, get any three print issues of Boston Review for just $35 – that’s 40% off the cover price!

Before December 9, mix and match any three issues for one low price using code 3FOR35.

"An indispensable pillar of the public sphere."

That’s what sociologist Alondra Nelson says of Boston Review. Independent and nonprofit, we believe in the power of collective reasoning and imagination to create a more just world.

That’s why there are no paywalls on our website, but we can’t do it without the support of our readers. Please make a tax-deductible donation to help us create a more inclusive and egalitarian public sphere—open to everyone, regardless of ability to pay.