Help Us Stay Paywall-Free

We rely on readers to keep our website open to all. Help sustain a public space for collective reasoning and imagination—make a tax-deductible donation today.

Orange-and-white checkered recycling truck in front of an apartment building on a street in Berlin.
Reading List August 13, 2023

Politics Is Bananas

After years of relative neglect, consumption is once again being politicized.

Denouncing liberal consumer politics is a grand old tradition on the left. Critics have had a range of targets, from the AFL-led transition to “bread and butter” unionism in the 1890s to advertising’s creation of false needs and the corporate marketing of “ethical” products and lifestyles so ubiquitous today. At bottom, their charge is that we should not seek a shallow freedom in the sphere of exchange, ceding what Karl Marx called the “hidden abode of production” to capital’s dictates.

But far from dismissing consumer politics, Marx insisted that we think of consumption as a dimension of production—and therefore as a key site of struggle. Some of today’s most heated debates on ecological crisis and degrowth proposals bear him out. Is it necessary—or politically viable—to criticize ordinary people’s market behavior in efforts to overhaul our economic system? Can you be anti-capitalist and still have an iPhone? Can we ask people to imagine life without an endless supply of bananas without jeopardizing movements for decarbonization and worker democracy?

These questions—whether and how to politicize individual spending, along with the broader structures of consumer society—have occupied many Boston Review contributors over the years. This week’s reading list revisits a prescient 1999 forum led by economist and sociologist Juliet Schor, putting it in conversation with more recent attempts to imagine how we might politicize the realm of exchange. Schor rejects the dichotomy between individualist voluntarism and structural determination, arguing that while consumer desires are causing harm, they are the product of structural forces and thus require “collective” responses in both policymaking and culture.

More recently, in a forum last year, theorist Kate Soper’s lead essay challenges the degrowth left not to cede the notion that “more sustainable consumption will always involve sacrifice.” A full-throated embrace of a post-capitalist economy, Soper argues, requires both material and philosophical transformations: we must develop an “alternative hedonism” that enables us to embrace a “postconsumerist vision of the ‘good life.’”

Other pieces on this week’s list complement and sometimes complicate these provocations. Historian Jackson Lears traces how conservation disappeared from ecological discourse. Paul Hockenos looks to the EU’s experiments in garbage regulation for an example of the kind of consumption-oriented policy Schor invites us to imagine. Psychologist Paul Bloom’s analysis of the pleasure in luxury consumption offers a counterpoint to Soper’s hypothetical “hedonism.” Will Rinehart urges not degrowth but a transition to a different kind of growth rooted in ecological abundance. Nanjala Nyabola identifies the pitfalls of a consumption politics focused on the Global North, while economist Jayati Ghosh argues that by focusing on GDP and degrowth we risk neglecting more immediate crises of unequal distribution. Read on for more.

Juliet B. Schor

Somebody needs to be for quality of life, not just quantity of stuff. And to do so requires an approach that does not trivialize consumption, but accords it the respect and centrality it deserves.

Kate Soper

Austerity is not the only way to save our overextended planet. A simpler life might be both more pleasurable and more equal.

Nanjala Nyabola

The critique of capitalism must take precedence over the critique of consumption.

Will Rinehart

Doing less is not enough. We have to do more, and we have to do it better.

Jayati Ghosh

The distribution of gains is more important than GDP.

Robert Pollin

When it comes to growth, the devil is in the details.

Jackson Lears

Conservation implies a new way of life.

Wendy A. Woloson
A cancer diagnosis reveals how pervasive consumerism has become, infecting even the stuff meant to heal us.
Paul Bloom

Most people own things they don’t really need. It is worth thinking about why.

Paul Hockenos

Pushing back against the throw-away economy, the EU is designing an industrial policy around garbage.

Our weekly themed Reading Lists compile the best of Boston Review’s archive. Previews are delivered to members every Sunday. Become a member to receive them ahead of the crowd.

Boston Review is nonprofit and reader funded.

We believe in the power of collective reasoning and imagination to create a more just world. That’s why we’re committed to keeping our website free and open to everyone, regardless of ability to pay. But we can’t do it without the financial support of our readers.

Help sustain a public space for collective reasoning and imagination, without ads or paywalls:

Become a supporting reader today.

Sign Up for Our

Vital reading on politics, literature, and more in your inbox. Sign up for our Weekly Newsletter, Monthly Roundup, and event notifications.

Most Recent

To make change, movements need to build endurance—the capacity to keep people showing up despite their differences.

Mie Inouye

most days, during some mid-day hour, / I close my eyes and say the Sh’ma. / But it’s always the wrong time of day, / and it’s the only prayer I know

Matthew Lippman
Andrew Ross

Now’s the time to get our latest issue!

Until September 29, sign up for a print membership and get a copy of On Solidarity, plus four forthcoming issues—that’s 5 issues for the price of 4 (and 50% off the cover price)!

Use code FREECOPY at checkout.

Now’s the time to get our latest issue!

Until September 29, sign up for a print membership and get a copy of On Solidarity, plus four forthcoming issues—that’s 5 issues for the price of 4 (and 50% off the cover price)!

Use code FREECOPY at checkout.