Help Us Stay Paywall-Free

We rely on readers to keep our website open to all. Help sustain a public space for collective reasoning and imagination—make a tax-deductible donation today.

September 28, 2019

The Legality and Reality of Torture

Our best writing from our archives on why torture is not the same thing as interrogation.

Amid all the global scandals recently,  has been drowned out. On September 18th, U.S. judges in a federal appellate court finally admitted that “enhanced” interrogation techniques are torture.

This comes seventeen years too late. In that time, Abu Zubaydah—the Saudi Arabian citizen detained in the wake of September 11 and still languishing in Guantánamo—has been waterboarded on 83 occasions, as well as being subjected to sleep deprivation, confinement in small, dark boxes, and physical assault.

In our latest piece, Joseph Margulies, one of Abu Zubaydah’s former lawyers, argues that while the decision is good news, we should have done much more. In the intervening years, the failure to register our collective disgust has allowed torture to become “just another word. Defused, it loses its explosiveness.”

We have paired Margulies’ essay with other essays from our archive in an effort to recapture some of what is at stake here: from the ethics of torture, to its legality, to its reality. Boston Review regular Judith Levine makes the case that asking whether torture “works” is an immoral question, Israeli legal scholar Itamar Mann examines the United States’s use of an Israeli precedent on abusive interrogation, and investigate reporter Lance Tapley reveals the results of his five years spent researching the torture conditions at a supermax prison in Maine.

Joseph Margulies
They also acknowledged, for the first time, that the grounds for torturing Abu Zubaydah—who was detained in the wake of September 11 and is still languishing in Guantánamo—were mistaken.
Judith Levine

It's like asking if slavery is good economic policy.

Adam Hosein

Why do so many legal theorists think prosecuting would be undemocratic?

Itamar Mann
Justifying the necessity defense in Israel and the United States.
Lance Tapley

Supermax Torture in America

Colin Dayan
The end of the Eighth Amendment.

Our weekly themed Reading Lists compile the best of Boston Review’s archive. Sign up for our newsletters to get them straight to your inbox before they appear online.

Boston Review is nonprofit and reader funded.

We believe in the power of collective reasoning and imagination to create a more just world. That’s why we’re committed to keeping our website free and open to everyone, regardless of ability to pay. But we can’t do it without the financial support of our readers.

Help sustain a public space for collective reasoning and imagination, without ads or paywalls:

Become a supporting reader today.

Get Our Newsletter

Sign up to get vital reading on politics, literature, and more sent straight to your inbox.

Donate Today

Most Recent

Lewis Gordon and Nathalie Etoke discuss the space for freedom opened up by Black existentialist thought.

Nathalie Etoke, Lewis Gordon

The post-work movement reckons with reproductive labor.

Rachel Fraser

Melvin Rogers and Neil Roberts discuss the difficulty of keeping faith in a foundationally anti-Black republic.

Melvin Rogers, Neil Roberts

Just in time for the holidays, get any three print issues of Boston Review for just $35 – that’s 40% off the cover price!

Before December 9, mix and match any three issues for one low price using code 3FOR35.

Just in time for the holidays, get any three print issues of Boston Review for just $35 – that’s 40% off the cover price!

Before December 9, mix and match any three issues for one low price using code 3FOR35.

We can't publish without your support.

For nearly 50 years, Boston Review has been a home for collective reasoning and imagination on behalf of a more just world.

But our future is never guaranteed. As a small, independent nonprofit, we have no endowment or single funder. We rely on contributions from readers like you to sustain our work.

If you appreciate what we publish and want to help ensure a future for the great writing and constructive debate that appears in our pages, please make a tax-deductible donation today.

"An indispensable pillar of the public sphere."

That’s what sociologist Alondra Nelson says of Boston Review. Independent and nonprofit, we believe in the power of collective reasoning and imagination to create a more just world.

That’s why there are no paywalls on our website, but we can’t do it without the support of our readers. Please make a tax-deductible donation to help us create a more inclusive and egalitarian public sphere—open to everyone, regardless of ability to pay.