Get Our Newsletter

We’ll send our latest essays, archival selections, reading lists, and exclusive editorial content straight to your inbox.

Hospital beds separated by green curtains

Image: Flickr

Is There a Cure for Medical Racism?

From unequal rates of COVID-19 death and hospitalization to biased pulse oximeters, medicine must reckon with the racism in its midst.

At its seventy-third annual meeting in Berlin last month, the World Medical Association adopted a statement decrying the harmful effects of racism in medicine. “Racism is rooted in the false idea that human beings can be ranked as superior or inferior based on inherited physical traits,” the statement opens. “This harmful social construct has no basis in biological reality.”

Though race is a social construct, this does not mean that racism cannot produce biological effects. As the statement goes on to explain—and this week’s reading list makes clear—when racism intersects with medicine and health, the results can be deadly.

Consider a biological function as basic as breathing. Black Americans’ higher rates of asthma and other pre-existing conditions have made them more vulnerable to respiratory illnesses such as COVID-19, as evidenced by their disproportionate death and hospitalization. But these rates have social origins; they are the result of structural racism. “Air pollution, stress, occupational hazards, and health care services are distributed, unequally, across the intertwined divides of class and race,” writes pulmonologist Adam Gaffney. “The hierarchies that structure our society distribute not just wealth but breath.”

Racism also manifests in medicine in less obvious but equally pernicious ways—even in seemingly neutral technologies such as pulse oximeters, for example (devices which attach to the finger and measure a person’s blood oxygen levels). As anthropologist of medicine Amy Moran-Thomas shows in an influential essay that has sparked a nationwide reckoning and FDA investigation regarding pulse oximeters over the last two years, a growing body of evidence suggests that these devices work less accurately for patients with darker skin, with potentially dangerous consequences. The discrepancy likely arises in part due to limited diversity among patients enrolled in health care trials, in part due to flaws in design or calibration, and in part due to the medical profession’s failure to follow up on warning signs in the medical literature. Moran-Thomas concludes the devices are a “disturbing materialization of how white supremacy has been built into our systems and infrastructures of perception.”

The essays in this week’s reading list explore these and other ramifications of racism in medicine and health care, as well as possible solutions. Physicians and historians examine the American Medical Association’s elitist conception of what makes a “good doctor”; two medical doctors offer a vision for medical restitution for communities that receive unequal care; and biologist and gender studies scholar Anne Fausto-Sterling calls for an updated medical school curriculum that reflects what we know about how racism and medicine intersect. Elsewhere, an infectious disease researcher discusses the growing role mass incarceration plays in the devastating global toll of tuberculosis, which receives little media attention in the Global North; a historian-psychiatrist considers the fraught place of psychiatry in prisons; and two physicians imagine how health care could be radically reimagined to genuinely promote the well-being of all.

Adam Gaffney
COVID-19’s disproportionate impact on Black communities is just one of many respiratory inequities shaped by systemic racism.
Amy Moran-Thomas
Pulse oximeters give biased results for people with darker skin. The consequences could be serious.
Eric Reinhart

As more and more doctors awaken to the political determinants of health, the U.S. medical profession needs a deeper vision for the ethical meanings of care.

Marco Ramos

Decades of biological research haven't improved diagnosis or treatment. We should look to society, not to the brain.

Katharine S. Walter
Until COVID-19, tuberculosis killed more people each year than any other infectious disease. Its rising toll is increasingly fueled by mass incarceration.
Anne Fausto-Sterling

Black people get sicker because of stereotypes taught in medical schools.

Marco Ramos, Tess Lanzarotta, Iris Chandler
American medicine has long functioned as an elitist institution, putting professional prestige over the well-being of patients and physicians alike.
Bram Wispelwey, Michelle Morse

Colorblind solutions have failed to achieve racial equity in health care. We need both federal reparations and real institutional accountability.

Wendy Johnson

Physicians have been fighting for health justice for decades. To succeed, we need practical models for collectively remaking our systems of care.

Our weekly themed Reading Lists compile the best of Boston Review’s archive. Previews are delivered to members every Sunday. Become a member to receive them ahead of the crowd.

Boston Review is nonprofit and reader funded.

Contributions from readers enable us to provide a public space, free and open, for the discussion of ideas. Join this effort – become a supporting reader today.

Sign Up for Our
Newsletter

Vital reading on politics, literature, and more in your inbox. Sign up for our Weekly Newsletter, Monthly Roundup, and event notifications.

Most Recent

In Foolproof, psychologist Sander van der Linden compares misinformation to viral infection—and claims to have a vaccine. 

Daniel Williams

N'Kosi Oates speaks with J.T. Roane about Philadelphia's spatial politics and resistance to racial containment.

N'Kosi Oates, J.T. Roane
Poetry

even the long-gone
once knew tenderness.

Kristin Emanuel

Vital Reading

Get our latest essays, archival selections, reading lists, and exclusive editorial content straight to your inbox. 




Supporter Membership

$100 / year

If you love Boston Review, support us with this biggest yearly membership.

Membership at this level includes:

  • Print subscription to Boston Review
    (4 issues/year)
  • Digital subscription to Boston Review
    (4 issues/year)
  • Access to our member portal and entire digital archive
  • Curated weekend Reading List
  • Weekly From the Archive newsletter

Digital Membership

$25 / year

Get even more out of Boston Reviewwith our digital membership.

Membership at this level includes:

  • Digital subscription to Boston Review
    (4 issues/year)
  • Access to our member portal and entire digital archive
  • Curated weekend Reading List
  • Weekly From the Archive newsletter

Print Membership

$50 / year

Turn the pages of Boston Review with our best value membership. 

Membership at this level includes:

  • Print subscription to Boston Review
    (4 issues/year)
  • Digital subscription to Boston Review
    (4 issues/year)
  • Access to our member portal and entire digital archive
  • Curated weekend Reading List
  • Weekly From the Archive newsletter