Occupy: Knowledge is Power

Boston Review has been following the Occupy Wall Street movement from its early stages. Our magazine has frequently drawn attention to the problems of rising inequality and money’s influence on politics, and we support the protesters’ efforts to flag these issues.

Below, you’ll find large (36 x 24 in.) color posters capturing some of the more shocking economic statistics from recent times. Thanks to Mother Jones, who assembled the data and graphics. We’ve enlarged them for you to download, print, and distribute, on Wall Street and elsewhere.

 

The Top 1% Took Your Income, 1979–2005

Download: PDF (large) | JPEG (smaller)
 
Share of Tax Revenue, 1950–2006

Download: PDF (large) | JPEG (smaller)
 
Gains and Losses, 2007-2009

Download: PDF (large) | JPEG (smaller)
 
Richest Members of Congress / Bush Tax Cuts

Download: PDF (large) | JPEG (smaller)
 
Household Income, 1979-2007

Download: PDF (large) | JPEG (smaller)
 

Post this page to: del.icio.us Yahoo! MyWeb Digg reddit Furl Blinklist Spurl

Comments

1 |
These are beautiful. I'm not a computer expert, but is there any way you guys could offer them in additional formats than PDF? I wanted to "share" one on my facebook page, but I don't think there's a way to share a pdf (without making people click the link, which most won't bother to do). I think these are the kinds of images that could be spread like wildfire online. Thanks!
— posted 10/16/2011 at 16:27 by christy
2 |
Wildfire
Yes, please make a jpg image of these to post on websites and places like Facebook! The would spread like wildfires. They are shocking and disturbing.
— posted 10/16/2011 at 21:30 by robin
3 |
Great Idea: JPEGs Now an Option
Thanks to you both for the suggestion.
— posted 10/17/2011 at 14:56 by Daniel E. Pritchard
4 |
Top 1% took your income?
The graphic is incredibly misleading, though I'm not sure if it was intended to be or not. The problem is that it uses a flat rate or ratio of an increase of income then, instead of using percentages or ratios, it attempts to quantify it in dollar amounts. The median income in the U.S. (what is denoted in the 41-60 percent range in the graphic) increased from $25700 to $33700 (after taxes and adjusted for inflation [2006 dollars]) The graphic would have you believe that income decreased for the median since 1979 when in reality, it increased by 31%.

Another problem is with the average income graph. The scale does not allow for any change to be seen in the bottom quartiles, which makes the viewer think they are flat and unchanging, when in reality, as previously shown, is not the case (the median increased by 31% after taxes but in the graphic it looks as though it hasn't changed). A posttax figure is a better representation of income as well as it is what an individual is able to spend. If I were taxed at a 75% rate, but my pretax income was 50% more than someone who isn't taxed at all, it would appear as though I have more disposable income even though that is not the case.

If you have a chance, adjust the graphics!
— posted 10/18/2011 at 12:03 by Derek
Name
E-mail (Will not appear online)
Title
Comment
To prevent automated Bots from spamming, please enter the text you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.



Powered by Comment Script
del.ici.ous  stumbleUpon  Reddit  Facebook    Digg   RSS Feed Icon

About the Author

Noam Chomsky,
The Responsibility of Intellectuals, Redux

Nathan Schnedier,
American Autumn

Leigh Elion,
Capitol Insiders


http://www.facebookloginhut.com/facebook-login/  http://www.facebookloginhut.com/facebook-login/ http://www.facebookloginhut.com/facebook-login/ 



Boston Review Newsletter